The DED didn't even exist at the time of the Syndicate's formation. I'm not even going to say "nice try" - you're just peddling straight misinformation.

I-RED needs to buff its recruiting standards. Hiring you was a mistake.

I em kekn undenstend whey yoeu mey etheink thies,. buet i muest diesagery :

Farstley :I aem theink thet Syendeickaet ies no very wel sieuetuaetinod; iet ies easey to asuelet aend wores yet ouer enenemeieyes now thies to bey treue .

Sekendley the spese thet sureouends thies aerea ies faer to hoeistile aet the menement, ies to threhatenaeting to beceome woerth whiele .,,. traed hes becomee stegneted ,.,. then empier daers noet medele in the effeiers oef synediicate,. ,.,. so then aevearge teyhcone deer noet atak.,,. buet i hev spokke to moch.,.,.,. i woued hev yoeu opinein of thies ?

Perhaps the prevalence of anti-social behaviour in the Syndicate is related to the role of charismatic leaders among the hard-boiled Intaki traditionalists. The hegemony of mademoiselle en Diabel, or that of mademoiselle Sundari could be seen as warning examples of this sort of group think. Open discussion and ongoing clash of different opinions and viewpoints are a solid way to avoid this pitfall. This might be one of the blessings that a stronger presence by the Federation could bring to the lives of the people in the area.

Anyhow, it's always a pleasure to read thoughtful in-depth analyses on topics that sometimes receive inaccurate and misleading treatments in alternative news media. This kind of fact-based information is precisely what needs to be taught to all children in schools.

Yes. In fact, no, actually - when you openly associate with and openly arrange and secure finance for criminal organisations, it's a lot more than simply guilty by assocaition.

Quoting the words of an entirely irrelevant anarchist and terrorist from a faction now so irrelevant its own leader - known only for her ability to talk - has stopped talking, will win you no favours with me, and given that your organisation just shot down a proposal that would actively benefit legitimate trade in the Intaki system, don't you ******* dare talk to me about the difficulties of legitimate trade.

Rodents? Well, I'm glad that we're at least being honest with our metaphors now.



Yes, criminals and exiles co-operating with criminals and exiles. It's to be expected. It doesn't surprise me. What surprises me is that people are pretending that the Syndicate are somehow honourable or exemplary when they very clearly aren't. They managed to take everything that was wrong with the Federation and amplify it. I look to the Syndicate as a cautionary tale, not a great huddled mass of oppressed unfortunates.



The Federation owes the Syndicate precisely nothing.

So far, I've shown I know a lot more about it than you do.



I love that you're whining about ad hominem attacks while using nothing other than ad hominem attacks to back up your... well let's be honest here, you don't even have an argument. All you've said is "no, that's wrong" without any substantiative evidence whatsoever.

You haven't actually demonstrated to me that it's wrong, you've demonstrated to me that you think it's wrong.



Only to people who know I'm right.